Relações entre os desempenhos em nomeação rápida, consciência fonêmica, conhecimento de letras e leitura escrita em 1° e 2° ano do Ensino Fundamental / Relations between the performance in rapid naming, phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in 1st and 2nd fundamental scholar degree

AUTOR(ES)
FONTE

IBICT - Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia

DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

19/08/2011

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to describe and compare the performance of students from 1st and 2nd fundamental scholar degree in tasks of phonemic awareness, rapid naming, letter knowledge, reading and writing and to verify the association between the results from the tasks. Participated from the study 60 children aged from 5:9 to 7:5 years-old from municipal schools at Pindamonhangaba central area. Subjects did not present any complaints or difficulties related to language and learning development. Experimental tests applied were: CONFIAS-Consciência Fonológica: instrumento de avaliação sequencial, (MOOJEN et al, 2003) to test phonemic awareness; rapid naming test from CTOPP- Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (WAGNER, TORGESEN, and RASHOTTE, 1999), adapted to Brazilian Portuguese by ROSAL (2002) and SIMÕES (2006); letter knowledge test (CARDOSO-MARTINS, 2006); and list of words and invented words (PINHEIRO, 1994) reduced as proposed by HERRERO (2007) for reading and writing testing. Subjects were separated into two groups: GP1 (1st grade) e GP2 (2nd grade). Comparison between groups indicated better performance for GP2 at all reading and writing subtests, all phonemic awareness subtests, alphanumeric rapid naming subtests and letter knowledge. Comparison among phonemic awareness subtests demonstrated better performance in tasks when target-phoneme were in the beginning of words and worst performance at segmentation and reverse abilities. In rapid naming differences depended on the school grade. The best performance was at digits rapid naming task for both GP1 and GP2 and letter rapid naming task for GP2 while the worst performance was at letter naming task for GP1 and color naming task for GP2. Positive correlations were observed between phonological processing abilities and reading and writing tasks depending on the subtests and school grade. Results also indicated positive association among letter knowledge, phonological processing abilities and reading and writing tasks but less associated to school effects.

ASSUNTO(S)

desenvolvimento da linguagem escrita language development leitura reading writing

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados