Infrações penais de menor potencial ofensivo à luz dos princípios constitucionais

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2007

RESUMO

We developed an ultima ratio Criminal Law, with sanctions more suitable to human dignity. In the procedural field, the hierarchical relationship of the State to those whom commit a transgression begins to give a consensus to the scope of the law, especially between the offender and the victim of a crime of minor seriousness: this consent will determine that Criminal Law then performs the special role of social pacifier. This tendency follows from the constitutional principles of the Criminal Law, especially ancillary, offense, proportionality, insignificance which aims to give protection to the larger judicial system and the use of alternative punishment instead of deprivation freedom. We have now have a legal concept but to reduce anything potentially prejudicial, it is needed to establish some flexibility of this concept: letting those who apply the Law the incumbency of rating, in each factual case, the greater or lesser seriousness of the offense of the case. We propose the choice of positive requisites (availability of the legal assets, favored features of inheritance/ancestral law, punishment in perspective and reparation to the injured party). Also to consider some crimes of lesser seriousness with a maximum punishment over two years, assets of negative requisite (Human Rights) in order to exclude from this list crimes with a maximum penalty less than two years

ASSUNTO(S)

direito penal requisitos positivos e negativos direito minor potentiality prejudicial crimes penas alternativas consenso no direito penal positives and negatives requisites princípios constitucionais crimes menor potencial ofensivo constitutional principles reparacao (direito) consensus to criminal law

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados