Estudo comparativo entre ultra-sonografia com Doppler colorido, angiografia por ressonância magnética, por subtração digital 2D e 3D na doença dos vasos carotídeos cervicais / A comparative study of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in cervical carotid stenoocclusive disease

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2009

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive techniques such as Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) are each day more used in the evaluation of the internal carotid arteries (ICA). On comparison studies 2D digital subtraction angiography (2D DSA) has been considerate as the reference standard, however its an expensive and invasive method, with well known risks, besides the use of 3D digital subtraction angiography (3D DSA) showed that 2D DSA can potentially result in an underestimation of the stenosis. OBJECTIVES: Compare stenosis measurements of noninvasive methods with 2D and 3D DSA, using the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria, compare the two noninvasive methods with each other, trying to identify if they can substitute 2D DSA on the daily basis and if that 2D DSA tends to underestimate the stenosis compared with 3D DSA. METHODS: 92 patients that were prospective and consecutive scheduled for 2D DSA were selected to participate in the study which included perform also a 3D DSA, CEMRA and DUS. The measurements of the greatest stenosis, made with the raw images in a workstation, by two observers in consensus, obtained with each modality (DUS, CEMRA) and the concordant results of both, were compared with the reference standard (2D and 3D DSA). Also a comparison between the invasive methods was made. RESULTS: 98 ICA were included. The results obtained by Pearson correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient, that range from 0.91 and 0.96, showed respectively a excellent correlation between the diagnostic modalities and that there are a great agreement between them (both with p<0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy values of the different comparisons range respectively from 76% to 100%, 92 to 100%, 79 to 100%, 90 to 100% and 90 to 100%. DISCUSSION: Comparisons with higher sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were respectively (DUS+CEMRA) x 3D DSA, with 100%, 100% and 100%; CEMRA x 3D DSA with 100%, 96% and 97% and 2D DSA x 3D DSA with 89%, 94% and 93%. 2D DSA categorized 11 cases (11,3%) of ICA stenosis as one category lower than 3D DSA, including 4 less cases of the 70-94% class. CONCLUSIONS: The noninvasive methods, especially if evaluated together, can replace 2D DSA in the study of cervical carotid steno-occlusive disease. 2D DSA tends to lightly underestimate carotid stenosis when compared to 3D DSA

ASSUNTO(S)

artérias carótidas carotid stenosis arteriografia estudo comparativo estenose das carótidas angiography doppler ultrasound magnetic resonance angiography ultra-sonografia doppler em cores comparison study carotid arteries angiografia por ressonância magnética

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados