Efeito do tipo de revestimento estetico e da eletroerosão sobre a desadaptação de infra-estruturas implanto-suportadas fundidas em titanio c.p / The influence of the veneering application and Spark erosion on the misfit level of implant-supported frameworks

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2007

RESUMO

The demand for a passive fit of frameworks for osseointegrated endousseous implants abutments is well known, because the tightening of an inaccurate framework to the abutments can transmit stress to the bone-metal interface. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of the veneering application and porcelain firing cycle on the misfit level of implant-supported frameworks. Forty Ti c.p. (Tritan, Dentaurum, Germany) alloy frameworks were fabricated from a metallic index containing 5 Branemark type multi unit abutments. Analogs of the abutments were positioned to the framework, to construct an index for each framework. This index allowed the observation of the marginal gaps caused by the application of the veneering material. The frameworks were grouped (n=10): 1) heat acrylic resin (Clássico, Clássico, São Paulo, Brazil); 2) light polymerized resin (Versyo.com, Heraeus Kulzer, Brazil); 3) porcelain application (Triceram, Dentaurum - Germany); 4) simulation of porcelain firing cycle. Marginal refinement with spark erosion was conducted on specific equipment (Tel Med Technologies, U.S.A.). The marginal gap was obtained before and after the veneering materials and the spark erosion procedure, following the single screw test protocol (using a tightening force of 10 Ncm). A traveling microscope (STN ? Olympus Optical Co. Ltd Japan (120X) was used, tightening 10N in the titanium screw of the extremity distal implant, measuring the gaps at the central and distal implants. Data were subject Analysis of Variance followed by Tukey test (5%). Marginal gap mean values of the frameworks before the veneering application were not significantly different: G1: 29.81 mu (+ 10.66); G2: 35.30 mu (+ 12.15); G3: 44.75 mu (+13.73); G4: 38.57 mu (+ 16.94). The application veneering materials and the simulation of porcelain firing cycle increased significantly the misfit mean values of all groups: G1: 221.70 mu (+14.11); G2: 81.91 mu (+15.71); G3: 233.99 mu (+39.18); e G4: 119.75 mu (+38.08). There were no significant differences between G1 and G3, but they were significantly different from both G2 and G3. After the spark erosion process, marginal gap mean value decreased significantly only G3 group: 161.16 µm (+36.59). G1: 198.68 mu (+34.19); G2: 62.03 mu (+17.73) and G4: 87.98 mu (+39.32) groups decreased the marginal gap mean values, but not significantly after the spark erosion procedure. As occurred after the application of veneering materials, G1 and G3 groups did not show significant difference, but they both were significantly different from G2 and G4 groups. It can be concluded that heat cured acrylic resin and porcelain produced the highest mean values of marginal gaps, while light cured acrylic resin, the lowest. The application of porcelain produced higher misfit values than the simulation of porcelain firing cycles. After the spark erosion process, marginal gap mean value decreased significantly only porcelain application group

ASSUNTO(S)

resinas acrilicas dental porcelain acrylic resins protese dentaria fixada por implante dental prosthesis porcelana dentaria

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados