Efeito da associação composito-materiais resilientes sobre a resistencia da união dentina/composito em modelos experimentais bi e tridimensionais

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2003

RESUMO

T he aim of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of different { resin composites and elastic layers on resin/dentin bond strength on " the buccal wall of Class I cavities. Ninety-six caries-free third molars were ground flat to expose the dentin surface under running water. Class I cavities (C-factor = 4.5, 4 mm mesial-distal, 3 mm buccal-lingual and 3 mm deep) were prepared in occlusal dentin and then randomly distributed into eighteen experimental groups by changing of three resin composites (SureFil, Filtek Z250 e Z100) and six elastic layers: 1SB(lc), Single Bond adhesive was applied of according manufacturer instruction s; 2- SB(3c), Single Bond adhesive received two additional coats; 3- SB+SBMP, Single Bond adhesive received two additional coats of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose adhesive; 4- OS(lc) Optibond Solo Plus adhesive was applied of according manufacturer instruction s; 5- SB+PLF, Single Bond adhesive received intermediate layer of low-viscosity composite Protect Liner F; and 6- SB+FF, Single Bond adhesive received intermediate layer of low-viscosity composite Filtek Flow. Each additional adhesive layer was individually light-cured. After created elastic layer, the composite was placed using a bulk-filling increment. The teeth were prepared for microtensile bond strength (IlTBS) with the bonded beams (of approximately 0.8 mm2) obtained from the buccal wall of the cavity. The samples were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h prior to IlTBS Testing. For each elastic layer, one additional group was accomplished to measure the bond strengths on corresponding buccal flat surface by cutting away the rest of the cavity walls (C-factor = 0.22). The data were analyzed using one and two-way ANOV A, Tukey Test for multiple comparisons and Dunnett s Test, at a significance levei of 0.05. The characteristic strength (TBSO) in this study varied about 11.2-29.6 Mpa. Statistical significant differences were verified among the resin composites (p = 0.0079) and among the various elastic layers in both cavity bonding groups (p<0.0001) and flat bonding groups (p = 0.0095). The Z250 resin composite showed the higher TBS means, with statistical differences of the Zl00. The SLirefil groups exhibited comparable TBS means to others two composites. In the cavity bonding groups, the TBS values for Z250, Z100 and Surefil were respectively: SB+SBMP (27, 22.9, 20.4)a, SB+PLF (19.8, 21.3, 18.5)ab, SB+FF (21.3, 19, 15.4)bC, SB-3e (17.9, 16.4, 14.2)bc, OS-1e (15.9, 14.2, 16)bc and SB-1e (17, 14.8, 11.2)C. The mean bond strengths obtained in eavity bonding group were significantly lower than those of the flat bonding group, exeept when the Z250 resin eomposite was associate with SB+SBMP, SB+PLF, SB+FF and SB(3e) and the Surefil resin eomposite was associate with SB+PLF. This association provides the best bond strengths in eavity, similar to the bonding on a flat eavity. The TBS means are dependent of the eomposite and the various formed elastie layer. The use of a low-viseosity eomposite or multiple applieations of adhesive as intermediate layer ean provide a stress absorbing layer, whereby inereasing the resin/dentin bond strength in box-shaped eavities

ASSUNTO(S)

dentistica adesivos dentarios materiais dentarios

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados