Aditivos fitogênicos e butirato de sódio como potenciais promotores de crescimento de leitões recém-desmamados / Phytobiotic additives and sodium butyrate as potential growth promoters of weanling pigs

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2009

RESUMO

The antimicrobials growth promoters in the animal feed have been related to an increase on animal performance. However, due to the restriction of many countries to the use of antimicrobial as growth promoters, alternatives are being studied. So, the purpose of this work was to evaluate the effect of phytobiotic additives, sodium butyrate and even colistina on performance, intestinal histology, digesta pH, organs morphometry, nutrients digestibility and diarrhea incidence of weanling pigs. A 34-d randomized complete block design experiment was carried out to compare five treatments: control (T1) basal diet; antimicrobial (T2) basal diet with 40 ppm of colistin sulfate; phytobiotic (T3) basal diet with 500 ppm of natural phytobiotics; sodium butyrate (T4) basal diet with 1500 ppm of sodium butyrate; and phytobiotic+sodium butyrate (T5) basal diet with 500 ppm of natural ptytobiotics + 1500 ppm of sodium butyrate. One hundred and twenty piglets (average age around 24 d and initial live weight of 6.10 ± 1.21 kg), eight replications per treatment, and three animals per experimental unit were used for performance data and diarrhea incidence. For digestibility assay, 60 piglets of first four replications were considered, using chromium oxide as fed marker. At the end of experimental period, an animal of each pen of first four replications was slaughtered for histology analysis, digesta pH and organs morphometry. Specific contrasts of practical importance were tested. No differences were found in performance data (P>.05). The treatments did not show any effect (P>.05) on diarrhea incidence and on digesta pH. Energy digestibility coefficient average of phytobiotic additives and sodium butyrate was higher (P=.07) than that of phytobiotic+sodium butyrate. Organs morphometry showed that the average of treatments T2, T3, T4 e T5 for weight:length ratio of small intestine was lower (P=.02) than that of control treatment. The average of phytobiotic and sodium butyrate treatments for caecum relative weight was lower (P=.09) than that of the phytobiotic+sodium butyrate treatment. For intestinal histology of duodenum, the average of villous density (DV) of phytobiotic and sodium butyrate treatments was higher (P=.06) than that of phytobiotic+sodium butyrate treatment. Piglets of phytobiotic treatment showed higher DV (P=.02) than those of sodium butyrate treatment. Jejunum DV average of treatments T2, T3, T4 e T5 was higher (P=.03) than that of control treatment. Piglets of sodium butyrate treatment showed higher DV than those of phytobiotic treatment (P=.08). Therefore, there was no evidence of natural phytobiotic and sodium butyrate as growth promoters of weanling pigs fed complex diet with high digestibility raised in experimental nursery. However, there are some indications that both phytobiotic and sodium butyrate added individually to weanling pig diets, may improve energy digestibility and some histology and morphometry traits.

ASSUNTO(S)

aditivos alimentares nutrition butiric acid leitões reguladores de crescimento. desmama animal herbal extracts antimicrobials piglets. nutrição animal agentes antimicrobianos

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados