THE CONCEPTUAL POSITIVISMO OF HANS KELSEN AND NEOJUSNATURALISMO FINISSIANO: A DEBATE ON JUSTICE / O POSITIVISMO CONCEITUAL DE HANS KELSEN E O NEOJUSNATURALISMO FINISSIANO: UM DEBATE EM TORNO DA JUSTIÇA
AUTOR(ES)
MATHEUS BEVILACQUA CAMPELO PEREIRA
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2010
RESUMO
This dissertation aims to counteract the natural right of Jonh Finnis with legal positivism of Hans Kelsen, more precisely as the considerations of these authors concerning the discussion about justice, as the reasons put forward by the two theories. The focus of our approach thus turns to the conceptual positivism of Kelsen, connected to the sources of law, where it is not admitted appraising the normative proposition as just or unjust, as well as the neojusnaturalismo of Finnis, who develops a methodology dense around of morality, to show that legal positivism only be able to perform a lucid description of the law, if it serves the tenets laid down in his theory. As a result of this incursion, our goal is also to demonstrate that legal reality requires the undeniable fact that both strands of the right approach at various points, and you may at times claim that the alleged dichotomy is indeed broken.
ASSUNTO(S)
justica justice direito law positivismo positivism natural natural hans kelsen hans kelsen
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
Documentos Relacionados
- A DEMOCRACIA NO PENSAMENTO DE HANS KELSEN - PRESSUPOSTOS E CONDIÇÕES DE SUA REALIZAÇÃO
- A questão da interpretação do direito à luz das teorias do positivismo jurídico de Hans Kelsen e do realismo jurídico escândinavo de Alf Ross
- Soberania e acumulação de capital: uma análise crítica de Hugo Grotius, Pasquale Mancini e Hans Kelsen
- Setor Informal e Gênero: Uma Discussão Conceitual e o Caso da Região Metropolitana de São Paulo
- Max Weber e Hans Kelsen: a sociologia e a dogmática jurídicas