Should doctors intentionally do less than the best?
AUTOR(ES)
Savulescu, J
RESUMO
The papers of Burley and Harris, and Draper and Chadwick, in this issue, raise a problem: what should doctors do when patients request an option which is not the best available? This commentary argues that doctors have a duty to offer that option which will result in the individual affected by that choice enjoying the highest level of wellbeing. Doctors can deviate from this duty and submaximise--bring about an outcome that is less than the best--only if there are good reasons to do so. The desire to have a child which is genetically related provides little, if any, reason to submaximise. The implication for cloning, preimplantation diagnosis and embryo transfer is that doctors should only produce a clone or transfer embryos expected to enjoy a level of wellbeing which is less than that enjoyed by other children the couple could have, if there is a good reason to employ that technology. This paper sketches what might constitute a good reason to submaximise.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=479195Documentos Relacionados
- Should we look after babies less than 800g?
- Drug treatment of Parkinson's disease: is "polypharmacy" best?
- Adjuvant radiotherapy for the primary treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: are we offering the best?
- Individual doctors do their best not to
- A new day dawns: women without oestrogen or is a balance best?
