Risk preference instability across institutions: A dilemma
AUTOR(ES)
Berg, Joyce
FONTE
National Academy of Sciences
RESUMO
In this article we use laboratory experiments to ask a fundamental question: Do individuals behave as if their risk preferences are stable across institutions? In particular, we study the decisions of cash-motivated subjects in the repeated play of three different institutions: a value elicitation procedure for the sale of a risky asset, an English clock auction for the sale of a risky asset, and a first-price auction for the purchase of a riskless asset. We first do a simple categorical comparison of each subject's risk preferences across tasks by comparing the individual's decisions with an expected value maximizer. All subjects acted as if they were risk-loving in the English clock auctions and risk-averse in the first-price auctions. In the Becker, Degroot, and Marschack procedure, behavior was split between risk-loving and risk-averse bidding. For each institution we also estimate an individual's risk coefficient. We test the hypotheses that for the same individuals the estimated risk coefficient across institutions is the same. We find that these estimates are statistically different.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=552975Documentos Relacionados
- Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
- Understanding institutions: different paradigms, different conclusions
- Internationalization of Higher Education Institutions: perceptions of scholars
- THE DESIGN OF CLIMATE INSTITUTIONS: CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ANALYSIS
- Formal Comparisons of Legislative Institutions: Ideal Points from Brazilian Legislatures