REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING THE MODERN CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS
AUTOR(ES)
Nakano, Naoki, Matsumoto, Tomoyuki, Muratsu, Hirotsugu, Ishida, Kazunari, Kuroda, Ryosuke, Kurosaka, Masahiro
FONTE
Acta ortop. bras.
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2016-12
RESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective: To determine whether the second-generation constrained condylar prosthesis provided satisfactory results in revision total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A series of 41 cases of revision total knee arthroplasty using the second-generation constrained condylar knee prosthesis was reviewed. The series comprised 7 men and 34 women with a mean age of 73.2 years. The original diagnosis was predominantly osteoarthritis. The most common reason for revision surgery was aseptic loosening. The mean interval between the primary and revision surgeries was 66.4 months. The mean follow-up period was 49.4 months. Results: The mean Knee Society knee score improved from 43.8 to 82.9 after revision surgery, the mean Knee Society function score improved from 37.1 to 79.2; the range of motion improved from 95.6° to 105.6° and the radiological femorotibial alignment improved from 181.4° (varus 6.4°) to 174.9° (valgus 0.1°), on average (p<0.001 at all items). Conclusion: Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of the second-generation constrained condylar knee prosthesis yielded reproducible clinical success. Level of Evidence IV, Case series.
Documentos Relacionados
- KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
- Influence of body mass index in revision total knee arthroplasty
- Does Concomitant Low Back Pain Affect Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes?
- Thromboprophylaxis for Total Knee Arthroplasty
- TREATMENT OF INFECTION AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY