Resultados da associação de braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose à teleterapia no câncer da próstata / Results of the association of high dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam irradiation in prostate cancer

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2010

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) for prostate cancer may be a nice treatment option for dose escalation as a boost, when associated to external beam irradiation, mainly if 3D conformal or more advanced technology is not available. PURPOSE: this study analyzes the results and toxicities of HDR brachytherapy boost prior to external beam radiotherapy with 2D or 3D conformal irradiation in patients with localized prostate cancer. Prognostic factors associated to overall and disease-free survival, as well as to treatment related toxicity were also studied. METHODS: A retrospective study of 403 patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma treated between December 2000 and March 2004 was performed. According to the risk group, three fractions of HDR brachytherapy were delivered in the course of 24 hours, with a single implant: 5.5 to 6 Gy per fraction for low risk, 6 to 6.5 Gy per fraction for intermediate risk, and 6.5 to 7 Gy per fraction for high risk patients. The interval between fractions was of at least 6 hours. Conventional 2D or 3D conformal external beam irradiation was delivered to the prostate and seminal vesicles with 25 fractions of 1.8Gy (45Gy), about 2 weeks after brachytherapy. Multivariate analysis was done to evaluate unfavorable prognostic factors for biochemical failure free survival (BFFS). RESULTS: Patients presented a median age of 68 years, mean PSA of 9g/ml, and average prostate weight of 35 cc. Gleason score was equal to 6 in 43% of the cases, and 97% of the cases were at a stage lower than T2c. Prostate nodules were present in 49% of the patients; prior history of transurethral resection or urinary obstruction was present in 11% and 16% of the patients, respectively. There were 36.1% patients in the low risk group, 42.8% in the intermediate, and 21.1% in the high risk groups, respectively. Up to six months of neoadjuvant hormone therapy was used in 64% of the cases. External beam radiation was delivered with 3D conformal radiation in 19% of patients. The mean follow-up was 50 months ranging from 24 to 113 months (median 48,4 months). Nine patients (2.2%) did not respond to treatment. Death from prostate cancer occurred in 4.5% of the cases in a mean period of 22 months. Biochemical failure occurred in 9.6% according to both ASTRO and Phoenix consensus criteria. However, the mean time to relapse was 13 months using the ASTRO criteria and 26 months with the Phoenix definition. The five-year BFFS using the ASTRO criteria was 94.3%, 86.9% and 86.6% for the low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively. Using the Phoenix criteria, 92.4%, 88.0% and 85.3% for the low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively (p = 0.109). The only feature predicting biochemical failure (BF) in the multivariate analysis by both ASTRO and Phoenix criteria was the presence of prostate nodules, but patients younger than 60 years presented higher chance of BF using Phoenix criteria only. Acute urinary toxicities as urinary retention and hematúria occurred respectively in 2.8% and 1.3% of the patients. They presented as grade 1 in 23.7%, grade 2 in 15.1% and grade 3 in 2%. Late urethral stenosis was observed in 8.5% and late urinary toxicity was grade 1 in 8.8% of the patients, grade 2 in 3.9%, grade 3 in 7.7% and grade 4 in 0.3%. Acute urinary toxicity was related to previous urinary obstruction and higher brachytherapy dose to the urethra. Late urethral stenosis was related to older age and higher brachytherapy dose. Grade 1 early rectal toxicity occurred in 14.8% of the patients, grade 2 in 10.5% and grade 3 in 1.3%. Late rectal toxicity occurred as grade 1 in 3.4% of patients, as grade 2 in 1.5%, grade 3 in 0.3% and grade 4 in 0.3%. The risk of acute and late rectal toxicity was higher when 3D conformal irradiation was used. Glans pain was observed in 4.9% of the patients. Late sexual impotence occurred in 71% of cases. Sildenafil was effective in 59%. Sexual impotence presented a higher incidence in older patients with one or two co-morbidities, previous sexual impairment, or 3D conformal irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: the association of HDR brachytherapy as a boost for external beam irradiation seems to be a feasible and safe procedure, with good efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Factors related to survival and toxicity can help to better select and manage patients with localized prostate carcinoma.

ASSUNTO(S)

radioisótopos de irídio/uso terapêutico brachytherapy neoplasias da prostata/radioterapia prostatic neoplasms iridium radioisotopes braquiterapia

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados