¿Que moral para un derecho intercultural?: la autonomía y el concepto "simpliciter" de tolerancia
AUTOR(ES)
Tiznado, Juan Pablo Zambrano
FONTE
Trans/Form/Ação
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2012-12
RESUMO
This article has two objectives. First, I want to represent a concept of tolerance simpliciter where personal autonomy and the need to strengthen a culture are the only reasons for which the agent-state must consider tolerance. Secondly, I intend to respond affirmatively to the question of whether, in the perfectionist and multicultural liberalism of Joseph Raz, intercultural rights can be derived from moral and political theory. To meet these objectives, I will focus on the moral uses of the word "tolerate" and then, following Sandel, on the analysis of critical and uncritical tolerance. Subsequently, I will explore Raz' liberalism in order to show the theoretical problems generated by the foundations of collective rights. I conclude by affirming the existence of collective rights as an institutional resource for enabling the development of cultural minority groups within the current development of the nation state.
Documentos Relacionados
- ¿Qué hay de nuevo en la metacognición? Revisión del concepto, sus componentes y términos afines
- El “crimen organizado”: un concepto extraño al derecho penal argentino
- El Derecho Humano a la Salud: Un estudio desde el derecho crítico
- La psicología social y el concepto de cultura
- Derecho positivo y derecho natural: una reflexión desde el iusnaturalismo sobre la necesidad y naturaleza de la determinación