Pro/con ethics debate: is nonheart-beating organ donation ethically acceptable?

AUTOR(ES)

Whetstine, Leslie

FONTE

BioMed Central

RESUMO

This pro/con debate explores the ethical issues surrounding nonheart-beating organ donation (NHBD), a source of considerable controversy. It is estimated that NHBD can increase the number of organs available for transplant by 25% at a time of great need. However, should NHBD be ethically acceptable? In support of NHBD, it may be acceptable practice if there is a separation of the rationale to withdraw life support/to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the decision to recover organs, if no conflicts of interest exist, if a waiting time precluding spontaneous return of circulation is included, and if NHBD conforms to a standardized protocol. Against NHBD, there are questions regarding the ambiguity and cultural perspectives of death, regarding whether a separation of rationale between withdrawal and donation is sufficient to preclude conflicts of interest, and regarding whether variable protocols arise that subordinate the patient to the goal of donation. Such concerns suggest NHBD may damage the trust in patient–physician relationships and may adversely affect organ donation rates.

Documentos Relacionados

• Pro/con clinical debate: Hydroxyethylstarches should be avoided in septic patients
• Pro/con clinical debate: Is high-volume hemofiltration beneficial in the treatment of septic shock?
• Pro/con clinical debate: do colloids have advantages over crystalloids in paediatric sepsis?
• Pro/con clinical debate: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is better than conventional ventilation for premature infants
• Pro/con clinical debate: Steroids are a key component in the treatment of SARS