Pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in critically ill and non-critically ill AIDS patients.

AUTOR(ES)
RESUMO

Current dosage regimens of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole used to treat Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in AIDS patients have been based on data from healthy subjects or patients without AIDS. The clearance and absorption characteristics of the drugs may potentially be different between patients with and without AIDS. This study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in critically ill and non-critically ill AIDS patients treated for P. carinii pneumonia. Patients received trimethoprim at 15 mg/kg of body weight and sulfamethoxazole at 75 mg/kg of body weight daily intravenously in three to four divided doses and were switched to the oral route when the regimen was tolerated. Serum samples for determination of drug concentrations were obtained over 12 h after intravenous and oral dosing. The pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole were compared in eight critically ill versus nine non-critically ill male patients and were as follows, respectively: clearance, 1.88 +/- 0.44 versus 1.73 +/- 0.64 ml/min/kg for trimethoprim and 0.40 +/- 0.12 versus 0.34 +/- 0.11 ml/min/kg for sulfamethoxazole; volume of distribution, 1.6 +/- 0.5 versus 1.5 +/- 0.5 liters/kg for trimethoprim and 0.5 +/- 0.3 versus 0.4 +/- 0.1 liters/kg for sulfamethoxazole; and half-life, 10.9 +/- 7.4 versus 11.3 +/- 4.0 h for trimethoprim, and 15.5 +/- 9.5 versus 14.3 +/- 4.7 h for sulfamethoxazole. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between patient groups, although there was wide intersubject variability. Absorption appeared to be similar between the critically ill and non-critically patients: bioavailability was 97.5% +/- 22.4% versus 101.8% +/- 22.7% for trimethoprim and 86.2% +/- 17.9% versus 99.1% +/- 20.5% for sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Because of the similar pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in critically ill and non-critically ill AIDS patients, the two groups of patients may receive similar dosages. Dosage adjustment does not appear to be required when switching from the intravenous to the oral route.

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados