Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia

AUTOR(ES)

Kotyashko, Anna, Ferreira-Pereira, Laura Cristina, Vieira, Alena Vysotskaya Guedes

FONTE

Rev. bras. polít. int.

DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

05/04/2018

RESUMO

Abstract This article assesses the normative resistance to Responsibility to Protect adopted by Brazil and Russia against the backdrop of their international identities and self-assigned roles in a changing global order. Drawing upon the framework of Bloomsfield’s norm dynamics role spectrum, it argues that while the ambiguous Russian role regarding this principle represents an example of ‘norm antipreneurship’, particularities of Brazil’s resistance are better grasped by a new category left unaccounted for by this model, which this study portrays as ‘contesting entrepreneur’.

Documentos Relacionados

• Explaining emerging powers’ reluctance to adopt intervention norms: normative contestation and hierarchies of responsibility
• Antimicrobial Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Emerging Ciprofloxacin Resistance in The Netherlands, 1991 to 1998
• Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
• The diffusion of innovations under normative induction in Brazil
• THE SURGEON'S RESPONSIBILITY IN ONTARIO ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CASES *