Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on “stenoses”?
AUTOR(ES)
Burgstahler, Christof
FONTE
BMJ Group
RESUMO
See article on page 1381
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2016896Documentos Relacionados
- Magnetic resonance imaging versus X-ray computed tomography--which is the appropriate first imaging examination?
- Thoracic calcifications on magnetic resonance imaging: correlations with computed tomography
- Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.
- Assessment of myocardial perfusion for detection of coronary artery stenoses by steady‐state, free‐precession magnetic resonance first‐pass imaging
- Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: Are we really making progress?