KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’

AUTOR(ES)

Goldin, Owen

FONTE

Manuscrito

DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

07/11/2019

RESUMO

Abstract What lies behind Aristotle’s declarations that an attribute or feature that is demonstrated to belong to a scientific subject is proper to that subject? The answer is found in APo. 2.8-10, if we understand these chapters as bearing not only on Aristotle theory of definition but also as clarifying the logical structure of demonstration in general. If we identify the basic subjects with what has no different cause, and demonstrable attributes (the kath’ hauta sumbebēkota) with what do have ‘a different cause’, the definitions of demonstrable attributes necessarily have the minor terms of the appropriate demonstrations in their definitions, for which reason the subjects and demonstrable attributes are coextensive.

Documentos Relacionados

• Resolving the question of color naming universals
• Weather Predicates, Unarticulation and Utterances
• Cultural universals: Measuring the semantic structure of emotion terms in English and Japanese
• PREDICATES, TERMS, OPERATIONS, AND EQUALITY IN POLYADIC BOOLEAN ALGEBRAS
• An algebra for Opengis coverages based on topological predicates