Julgamento dos recursos repetitivos nos tribunais superiores : uma nova leitura do princípio da inafastabilidade da jurisdição.

AUTOR(ES)
FONTE

IBICT - Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia

DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

11/02/2011

RESUMO

The law being the instrument used by state to organize social relations feeds upon this (social) reality in order to shape its terms and content. Thus the Law must respond to the demands and needs of the society it regulates. Otherwise it would not need be. Based on this idea the Judicial Process while a state instrument used in the making of norms and the pursuit of social peace also seeks to uphold both the ideals and the very purpose of Substantive Law so as to transform itself according to the changes occurred in the reality materialized in the Law. Therein when the outline of social and legal relations change now characterized by the presence of mass relations so do the legal doctrine and (substantive and procedural) concepts that regulate said relations. Regarding the right of access to justice this could not be different. This research examines the repercussions brought by mass society into the shaping of the content of the right of access to justice. In order to do so it will use the impressions arising from the review of the new procedural instruments used in repetitive trial cases specifically in repetitive appeals ruled by the higher courts. A good understanding of these instruments will allow the correct and current calibration that must be ascribed to the contents inferred from so highly-esteemed a norm (the right of access to justice).

ASSUNTO(S)

repetitive appeals in the higher courts. recursos repetitivos nos tribunais superiores princípio da inafastabilidade da jurisdição acesso à justiça direito principle of access to justice

Documentos Relacionados