Health sciences librarians and mental health laws.

AUTOR(ES)

Hartz, F R

RESUMO

Two U.S. Supreme Court decisions, O'Connor v. Donaldson and Bounds v. Smith, hold important implications for health sciences librarians serving in mental health facilities. The first, O'Connor, with its many ancillary holdings, puts mental health personnel on notice that patients have certain basic rights, which courts all over the country will now be required to enforce. In Bounds the court has ruled that prison authorities must assist prison inmates in preparing and filing legal papers. The ruling will most likely benefit all mentally disabled prisoners, and future litigation may expand this category to include: (1) persons committed under the criminal code, (2) persons under involuntary commitment not related to the criminal code, and (3) persons voluntarily committed. A selective annotated bibliography, consisting of background readings in mental health and the law, basic rights, law library materials, and mental health legal services, has been compiled to help librarians establish and develop legal collections in anticipation of court decisions that will expand the conditions of Bounds to include all mentally disabled patients.

Documentos Relacionados

• Integrating health sciences librarians into biomedicine.
• Academic health sciences librarians' publication patterns.
• The spread of state any willing provider laws.
• Preparing tomorrow's health sciences librarians: feasibility and marketing studies.
• Information needs of student and beginning health sciences librarians.