Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measuring Classical Pathway Complement Activity
AUTOR(ES)
Jaskowski, Troy D.
FONTE
American Society for Microbiology
RESUMO
The complement system plays an important role in host defense against infection and in most inflammatory processes. The standard 50% hemolytic complement (CH50) assay is the most commonly used method of screening patient sera for functional activity of the classical complement pathway. Our objective in this study was to compare two newer methods (the enzyme immunoassay and the liposome immunoassay) to a commercial CH50 assay for measuring total classical complement activity. We conclude that both newer methods compare well with a CH50 assay and are equally sensitive in screening routine clinical sera.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=95674Documentos Relacionados
- Comparison of Three Methods for Measuring Electrical Resistances of Plant Cell Membranes 1
- COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING BODY FAT AFTER A WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM
- Comparison of two methods for measuring thermal thresholds.
- Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care
- BOWEL PREPARATION BEFORE COLONOSCOPY FOR CHILDREN: comparison of efficacy of three different methods