Comparison of systolic and pulse pressure variation during pressure and volume controlled ventilation. Experimental study in rabbits / Comparação da variação da pressão sistólica e de pulso nas ventilações com pressão e volume controlados: estudo experimental em coelhos

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2006

RESUMO

Rationale: Systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) indices have been proposed as effective methods of hemodynamic monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. SPV is calculated by the difference between the maximum and minimum values of systolic blood pressure following a single positive pressure breath, and it is made up of the sum of their components delta up and delta down; PPV is obtained by the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure also in a single positive pressure breath. The purpose of this study was to evaluate SPV and its components, and PPV during volume (VCV) and pressure (PCV) controlled ventilation in normovolemic rabbits or ones submitted to graded hemorrhage. Method: Thirty two rabbits were randomly allocated in four groups: G1- ConPCV, G2-HemPCV, G3-ConVCV and G4-HemVCV. They were ventilated in PCV or VCV; tidal volume was fixed between 10 to 12 mL.kg-1 and respiratory rate was monitored in order to maintain normocapnia. In control groups (G1- ConPCV and G3-ConVCV) blood was not withdrawn and each moment was evaluated for 30 minutes (M0, M1 and M2); in hemorrhage groups (G2-HemPCV and G4-HemVCV) there was no blood loss in M0; in M1 and M2 15% of estimated volemia was graded withdrawn. Data were submitted to analysis of variance for repeated measures (ANOVA); significance level was p<0,05 and results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Results: In M0, no significant differences were observed among all groups. Hemorrhagic groups (G2-HemPCV and G4-HemVCV) presented higher SPV, delta down and PPV in M1, differing significantly (p<0,05) only from control groups. When 30% of estimated blood volume was removed, higher SPV, delta down and PPV were observed mainly in G4-HemVCV. Cardiac output did not vary significantly (p>0,05) among groups and moments. Conclusions: In rabbits with normovolemia or slight hemorrhage, both modes of ventilation had similar behavior over studied parameters, while in the ones undergoing moderate hemorrhage PCV determined less hemodynamic compromising

ASSUNTO(S)

blood volume coelhos cardiac output hemodynamic processes respiração artificial débito cardíaco volume sanguíneo blood pressure hypovolemia processos hemodinâmicos hipovolemia rabbits artificial respiration pressão arterial

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados