Bricker ileal conduit vs. Cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review
AUTOR(ES)
Korkes, Fernando; Fernandes, Eduardo; Gushiken, Felipe Arakaki; Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo; Baccaglini, Willy; Timóteo, Frederico; Glina, Sidney
FONTE
International braz j urol
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2022
RESUMO
ABSTRACT Purpose: A systematic review of the literature with available published literature to compare ileal conduit (IC) and cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) urinary diversions (UD) in terms of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of high-risk elderly patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). Protocol Registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42020168851. Materials and Methods: A systematic review, according to the PRISMA Statement, was performed. Search through the Medline, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, and Cochrane Database until July 2020. Results: The literature search yielded 2,883 citations and were selected eight studies, including 1096 patients. A total of 707 patients underwent IC and 389 CU. Surgical procedures and outcomes, complications, mortality, and quality of life were analyzed. Conclusions: CU seems to be a safe alternative for the elderly and more frail patients. It is associated with faster surgery, less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, a lower necessity of intensive care, and shorter hospital stay. According to most studies, complications are less frequent after CU, even though mortality rates are similar. Studies with long-term follow up are awaited.
Documentos Relacionados
- Transperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A retrospective study
- Systemic treatment for invasive bladder cancer: neoadjuvant chemotherapy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy
- High mortality rates after radical cystectomy: we must have acceptable protocols and consider the rationale of cutaneous ureterostomy for high-risk patients
- Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit: one center experience and clinical outcomes
- Management Strategies for Sexuality Complaints after Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review