Avaliação da microinfiltração marginal em cavidades classe II de molares decíduos restauradas com diferentes cimentos de ionômero de vidro / Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities of primary molars restored with different glass ionomer cements

AUTOR(ES)
FONTE

IBICT - Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia

DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

26/02/2008

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage in class II glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars. For this, were selected fourty primary molars in a human teeth bank. At mesial and distal surfaces of the teeth were prepared standard class II cavities. In sequence, the teeth were subdivided in eight experimental groups in according with the restorative material used: group MXR (Maxxion R); group VDR (Vidrion R); group VTR (Vitremer); group VTF (Vitro Fill LC); group FUJ (Fuji IX); group KTM (Ketac Molar); group VMO (Vitro Molar); group MGS (Magic Glass ART). After past twently four hours in immersing water, the restored teeth were immersed in a 50% solution of silver nitrate for similar period, and, then, in radiographic solution (hydroquinone, Kodak) for fiteen minutes. The teeth were sectioned at the center of restorations, and observed at stereoscope under forty-fold increase. The microleakage was graduated in scores related with the grade of silver nitrate penetration at the adhesive interface. The results, after submitted statistical analysis, showed that none of the materials impeded completely the microleakage. Thus, Vitremer showed the minor scores, followed by Ketac Molar and Fuji IX. The materials, Magic Glass ART, Vitro Molar, Vitro Fill LC and Vidrion R showed intermediary results, while Maxxion R showed the worse ones. Based in methodology used in this study and in their results, its possible concluded that none of the materials was able to impede the microleakage, although presented variable grades susceptibility of this phenomenom, with emphasis to Vitremer, Ketac Molar and Fuji IX because presented minor microleakage, following Magic Glass ART, Vitro Molar, Vitro Fill LC and Vidrion R. On the other hand, Maxxion R presented the worse results, fact confirmed by high microleakage scores observed.

ASSUNTO(S)

infiltração dentária cimento de ionômero de vidro dente decíduo odontopediatria dental leakage glass ionomer cement primary teeth

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados