Avaliação da função autonômica em portadores de cardiomiopatia hipertrófica com e sem síncope / Assessment of autonomic nervous function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with and without syncope

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2010

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unexplained syncope is considered a risk factor for sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Several mechanisms are involved in its pathogenesis, including the difficulty in adaptation of the systemic vascular resistance to exertion and to orthostatic stress, which may be influenced by a dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system. The purposes of this study were to compare the autonomic nervous function in patients with HCM with and without syncope and to assess diagnostic value of the head-up tilting test (HUT) in this population. METHODS: Thirty seven patients were included: 16 with unexplained syncope at routine evaluation and 21 without syncope. The autonomic nervous function was assessed by spontaneous and phenylephrine-induced baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and by heart rate variability (HRV). Considered HRV variables in time domain were: standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), and percentage of adjacent normal RR intervals which differ by at least 50 ms (pNN50), during 24 hours electrocardiogram recording. In frequency domain, high, low and very low frequency bands and the spectrum total power density were considered, both in absolute values and in normalized units, at rest and at 60-degree tilting. Measures of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, beat to beat, and measures of stroke index, cardiac index, and systemic vascular resistance, obtained by impedance cardiography, were compared between the groups, at 0-, 30- and 60-degree tilting. The HUT consisted in exposure to 60º for 40 minutes, or until a positive response. RESULTS: Spontaneous BRS measures were similar between the syncope and non-syncope groups (16.46±12.99 vs 18.31±9.88 ms/mmHg, p=0.464), as well as phenylephrine induced BRS (18.33±9.31 vs 15.83±15.48 ms/mmHg, p=0.521). No differences were found between SDNN values (137.69±36.62 vs 145.95±38.07 ms, p=0.389). The syncope group presented lower values of RMSSD (24.88±10.03 vs 35.58±16.43 ms, p=0.042) and a trend to lower pNN50 (4.51±3.78 vs 8.83±7.98 %, p=0.085) and to lower high frequency component of spectral analyses at rest (637.59±1295.53 vs 782.65±1264.14 ms2, p= 0.075). No differences were observed between the groups in the others parameters analyzed in the frequency domain. Adaptation of hemodynamic variables at different tilting degrees was similar between the groups at the various positions studied. Positive responses to HUT were similar in the two groups (6% in syncope group and 33% in no-syncope group; p=0.053). HUT sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in identifying the cause of syncope in this population were, respectively, 6%, 66% and 40%. CONCLUSION: A lower parasympathetic activity, measured by HRV, was observed in HCM patients with syncope. No differences were found in vagal reserve and in adaptation to orthostatic stress between the groups. HUT showed poor sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in diagnosing unexplained syncope in this population.

ASSUNTO(S)

síncope hypertrophic cardiomyopathy syncope cardiomiopatia hipertrófica sistema nervoso autônomo teste de inclinação autonomic nervous system head-up tilting

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados