Alcance e limites teórico-metodológicos da pesquisa multicêntrica de indicadores clínicos de risco para o desenvolvimento infantil / Theoretical and methodological scope and limits of multi-center research on clinical risk indicators for child development

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2010

RESUMO

The present study originated in the Mulri-Center Reaserch on Clinical Risk Indicators for Child Development, which validated the pediatric use of a tool named Clincal Risk Indicators for Child Development (CRICD) Indicadores Clínicos de Risco para o Desenvolvimento Infantil (IRDI), based on the psychoanalytical theory. Besides the results directly related to the validation of risk indicators, CRICD Research provided empirical evidence of some important psychoanalytic theoretical formulations and incited methodological discussions by proposing a combination of the experimental and clinical methods. The present study aims at two relevant goals: to widen CRICDs theoretical basis and to propose a methodological discussion. And had also two specific objectives: a) explore in greater detail results obtained from a specific sample group of 130 children which are related to the theoretical axis called Paternal Function; b) unveiling the psychopathology of early infancy. To accomplish the expansion theory, the study examined the theoretical fundamentals of each one of the 31 indicators proposed by the CRICD Research.The methodological discussion contained in this study was guided by the following question, which in turn oriented our research: does the use of experimental methodology undermine the psychoanalytical basis of CRICD Research? Regarding the specific sample of 130 childrens. The present study also explores in greater detail results obtained from a specific sample group of 130 children. Clinical findings show the emergence of two significant symptomalogies in three-year old children: aggressiveness and the lack of a plot when playing, which are understood as the effects of a fragile performance of the paternal function. By means of a methodological discussion, we conclude that the conceptualization and fundamentals of this study are indeed psychoanalytical and the methodology employed allowed for an interdisciplinary convergence (Hans) and interactions of psychoanalysis (Mijolla-Mellor) with other disciplines. It intends to show that the use of different methods is not conflictive with psychoanalytical semiology. Psychoanalysis is neither a unique research modality, nor is its methodological reference unique. Such constitutive diversity and heterogeneity allow for psychoanalysis to interact with other disciplines and to progress by means of diverse and heterogenic sources, as Mijolla proposes.

ASSUNTO(S)

child psychoanalysis childhood development constituição do sujeito constitution of the subject desenvolvimento infantil métodos de pesquisa psicanálise de criança psychoanalytic theory research methodology teoria psicanalítica

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados