Accuracy of immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin A of saliva in early diagnosis of dengue: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AUTOR(ES)
COLONETTI, TAMY, ROCHA, BELISE V.E., GRANDE, ANTÔNIO J., ALEXANDRE, MARIA C.M., DONDOSSOLA, EDUARDO R., MADEIRA, KRISTIAN, ROSA, MARIA I.
FONTE
An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc.
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
25/06/2018
RESUMO
ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to conduct a systematic review to synthesize the current evidence on the accuracy of IgM and IgA to early diagnosis the dengue virus. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD 42015024808). We searched for studies in the following electronic database from 1990 to January 2018. The search identified 3507 studies. Five studies were included for quantitative analysis. Three studies included evaluations of salivary IgM provided a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 93%. Two studies included evaluating of IgA salivary showed a combined sensitivity of 69% and a combined specificity of 98%. Despite the results found and the low methodological quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis it is still soon to claim that IgA is better than IgM to diagnosis Dengue.
Documentos Relacionados
- Accuracy of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
- Diagnosis accuracy of PCA3 level in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis
- Clinical aspects and diagnosis of leishmaniasis in equids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Anger and substance abuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis